from Patent #4524079:Deactivation of Microorganisms by an Oscillating Magnetic FieldBy experimentation it is known that exposing matter infected with microorganisms to an oscillating magnetic field (of decaying strength) at frequencies above 5,ooohz (but no more than 500,ooohz) and with an electro-magnetic strength above 5 Tesla (50,000 gauss) will reduce the number of live microorganisms to 4% or less of its original number (both inside and on the surface of said matter). Complete sterilization is effected by exposure to more than one oscillation sequence. Microorganisms included in this effect are viruses, bacteria, mold, protozoa, and algae. The decaying magnetic oscillations can be produced by discharging voltage from a capacitor into a coil so that the capacitor and coil are in an electrical loop so that no other components will deter from the natural back and forth oscillations that result from the electrical current varying in direction as it goes through the coil producing magnetic fields that repeatedly change from north pole energy to south pole energy (and vice versa). About 10 magnetic pulses output (5 north and 5 south pole) is all that is significant in strength because each pulse becomes weaker than the one before due to energy dissipation in the wire, coil, and capacitor. The best range of intial magnetic field strength is 5 to 50 Tesla, but anywhere between 2 and 100 will work. (BioElectrics Pulser 5K output is estimated to be 3.4 Tesla.). Usually the higher the electrical conductivity is of the infected matter, the less magnetism strength is needed to kill the microbes. The human body is very conductive due to the presence of sodium and potassium and water throughout. Total exposure time to one 5,ooohz oscillation sequence of 5 +/- cycles is only one thousandth of a second. When treating food with minimal electrical conductivity it is best to expose it to 10-100 oscillation sequences for complete sterilization. Whether the microorganisms are killed or just rendered inactive is uncertain. The standard plate count method used to determine the number of active microbes before and after a treatment does not distinguish between dead microbes and those that are immobilized and non-reproducing . It is thought that while some are killed, the majority are just devitalized so that they can't reproduce (and therefore can't infect anymore). This process has a minimal negative effect on human tissue and does not alter the gross characteristics of normal tissue. Here are some test results proving this treatments effectiveness: infected initial count end matter microbe per sq cm treatment count -------- ------- ------------- --------- ----- milk streptococcus 25ooo 1 sequence 970 thermophilus 12 tesla (a bacteria) 6,ooohz bread mold spores 3ooo 1 sequence 1 7.5 tesla 8,5oohz yogurt saccharomyces 35oo 10 sequences 25 (a bacteria) 40 tesla 416,ooohz orange saccharomyces 25ooo 1 sequence 6 juice (a bacteria) 40 tesla 416,ooohz from Patent #4665898 Cancer Treatment by an Oscillating Magnetic FieldTEST # 1 Cells treated with an 8,ooohz oscillating magnetic field of 8 sequences at 5 Tesla were tested for percentage of dead cells after 18 hours in comparison to untreated cells, with normal epithelial cells as a point of reference. Magnetic treatment proved at least a fourfold rate of cancer cell death over that of normal cell death due to treatment. % dead cells after 18 hours -------------------------------- Difference CELL TYPE Untreated Cells Treated Cells due to treatment --------- --------------- -------------- ---------- normal 10% 14% 4% epithelial undifferentiated 1% 17% 16% carcinoma embryonal 8% 29% 21% carcinoma TEST # 2 Evaluation of rat mammary cancer tumors following 6 days of magnetic treatment (20 sequences of 5 tesla at 8,ooohz) and 16 days non-treatment. Shrinkage or interruption of growth was experienced by all tumors. Tumors were induced with 1 oral feeding of dimethyl-benzanthracene (DMBA) 1 month previously, or 3 successive intravenous doses of N-nitrosomethyl urea (NMU) 3 weeks previously. 16 Days After Treatment Period ------------------------------ Total # of tumors # of tumors cancer # of with growth with cause tumors interruption shrinkage ------ ------ ------------ ------------ DMBA 8 2 6 NMU 10 1 9 TEST # 3 Mammary cancer tumor measurements in 11 rats before and after 30 days of magnetic treatment. (cancers were induced by DMBA.) Most remained nearly the same size while 3 enlarged by about 3 times the original size, which still is very good compared to the 10-30 times size growth normally had by untreated tumors of this virulent type after 30 days. treatment by 20 sequences of 8,ooohz 5 Tesla --------------------------------------------- tumor volume in square centimeters ---------------------------------- rat # Day 1 Day 30 final volume divided by initial volume ----- ----- ------ ------ 1 .9 .42 .47 2 2.1 1.20 .57 3 1.1 .85 .77 4 .38 .45 1.18 5 1.6 1.95 1.22 6 3.01 3.81 1.27 7 6.79 8.88 1.31 8 1.4 3.81 2.72 9 1.2 3.65 3.04 10 2.1 8.18 3.89 11 1.6 1.4 .87 (this was with 1.2 Tesla)Test 3 notes: These results are very favorable, especially considering that rat mammary tumors induced in this manner normally increase in size by 10-30 fold after 30 days (see Journal of National Cancer Institute, Vol 54, no. 2, Feb '74) but the treated tumors averaged only 1.57 their original size after 30 days. Tumors of this type left untreated will normally ulcerate within 45 days. On day 60 of experiment #3 all but 1 rat was still alive with stabilized or reduced tumors. Throughout the test the rats generally appeared to exhibit normal behavior and appetite and did not appear to lose weight. The fact that the rats did not die of infections suggested that the immune systems functioned normally. Michael's Summary: It is evident by these tests that the greatest advancement in tumor destruction is had in the beginning, with good results tapering off as time goes by. This type of treatment is just one more tool for the use in the war on cancer and may be significant enough to save lives if used along with other natural healing modalities. |