1. American
College of Physicians warns women in their 40s about dangers of
mammograms.
The American College of Physicians has recommended women in their
40s consult with their doctors before undergoing routine annual
mammography screening. An expert panel from the American
College of Physicians (ACP), which represents 120,000 internists,
made this recommendation in the April 3 issue of the journal Annals
of Internal Medicine.
After reviewing 117 studies conducted between 1966 and 2005, the
panel found the data on mammography screening for women in their 40s
are so unclear that the effectiveness of reducing breast cancer
death could be either 15% or “ … nearly zero.”
The dangers of mammography are recognized in the medical field.
According to Dr. Samuel Epstein of the Cancer Prevention Coalition,
“Screening mammography poses significant and cumulative risks of
breast cancer for pre-menopausal women.”
The routine practice of taking four films of each breast annually
results in approximately 1 rad (radiation absorbed dose) exposure,
about 1,000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray. The
pre-menopausal breast is highly sensitive to radiation, each 1 rad
exposure increasing breast cancer risk by about 1%, with a
cumulative 10% increased risk for each breast over a decade’s
screening. These risks are even greater for younger women subject to
“baseline screening.”
2. The Nordic
Cochrane Centre in Denmark found that mammograms may harm 10 times
as many women as they help.
The researchers examined the benefits and negative effects of
seven breast cancer screening programs on 500,000 women in the
United States, Canada, Scotland and Sweden. The study’s authors
found that for every 2,000 women who received mammograms over a
10-year period, only one would have her life prolonged,
but 10 would endure unnecessary and potentially harmful treatments.
However, the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) breast
screening program – which provides free mammograms for women over
the age of 50 every three years – cited different statistics in
defending its program. An NHS statement said the Department of
Health’s advisory committee on breast cancer screening had
conducted its own evaluation of the program, and found that
screening prolonged the lives of five women out of
every 2,000 over a 10-year period.
3. Mammograms
can cause breast cancer.
Definitive studies by the North Carolina Institute of Technology
explain why mammograms can cause breast cancer. The high
radiation (1-10 rads depending upon the exam) burns tissue as all
direct radiation does. If the woman has oral pathology, and the
deadly toxins from her mouth are moving into the breast, the burnt
or damaged tissue is attacked by these neurotoxins which are
escaping from the jaw, and the tumor begins to form.
The neurotoxins first inhibit the body’s ability to fight off
tumor formation and the unacceptable radiation dosages finish the
job. Since mammographic screening was introduced, the incidence of a
form of breast cancer called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS ) has
increased by 328%.
Dowling’s Law: You don’t get breast cancer unless
you have oral pathology. The trigger for cancer is deadly
neurotoxins produced by bacteria in the mouth. It follows that
prevention of cancer starts in the mouth.
4. Mammography
can also help spread existing cancer cells due to the considerable
pressure placed on the woman’s breast during the procedure.
According to some health practitioners, this compression could
cause existing cancer cells to metastasize from the breast site.
Research has also found a gene, called oncogene AC that is extremely
sensitive to even small doses of radiation. A significant percentage
of women in the United States have this gene, which could increase
their risk of mammography-induced cancer. They estimate that 10,000
AC carriers will die of breast cancer this year due to mammography.
5. The risk
of radiation is higher among younger women.
The NCI (National Cancer Institute) released evidence that, among
women under 35, mammography could cause 75 cases of breast cancer
for every 15 it identifies. Another Canadian study found a 52%
increase in breast cancer mortality in young women given annual
mammograms.
6. Is there
an alternative to mammography?
Yes, but it’s not just “alternative technology.”
High-resolution Digital Infrared Thermal Imaging (DITI) , now
accepted by Duke University, is fast becoming accepted mainstream
technology, thanks to the discoveries of the North Carolina
Institute of Technology (NCIT), a privately funded research center.
Thermal imaging provides a safe, simple, painless, and
inexpensive facial scan to identify what NCIT has proven to be
the cause of all breast cancers – it’s in the mouth. Tens of
thousands of cases. No exceptions!
And thermal imaging, done using the protocol established by NCIT,
will find developing breast cancer 10 years earlier than
mammography.
7. Why is it
that the American Cancer Society continues to dance to the drumbeat
of mammograms, and pretend that thermal imaging is experimental?
You need to know the truth and you’ll find it in the tell-all
book, Am I Dead? … or do I just feel like it. Cancer cured …
the coming storm. Call toll-free 1-888-943-2563 to order.
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME
TO APPLY THE SAFE TECHNOLOGY FOR DISCOVERING
BREAST CANCER
DEVELOPED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA INSTITUTE OF
TECHNOLOGY
